The Ultimate Facade Inspection Laws You Need To Know For Parking Garages

This is a guest blog by Nick Heim, P.E.

Facade Inspection Laws

Facade inspection laws (also referred to as exterior wall inspection laws)  exist to protect public safety and extend the life of a building’s exterior. New York City was a pioneer in this area, enacting the first facade inspection law in 1980 (Local Law 10/1980).      This came in response to several high-profile incidents in the late 1970s, where debris from deteriorated building exteriors posed significant risks to pedestrians and surrounding properties.

Relationship Between Facade Inspection Laws and Parking Garage Regulations

While facade ordinances focus on the maintenance and safety of buildings’ exterior envelopes, they apply to parking garages only if the garages meet specific criteria—typically related to height and age.

In some jurisdictions,      parking garages are regulated under separate inspection laws. These laws address structural integrity and require both the exterior AND interior of the parking garage to be inspected. For further details on parking garage inspection laws, see “Parking Garage Laws in the US (StructureCare).

Jurisdictional Overview

The table below summarizes facade ordinances in several major U.S. jurisdictions.

Jurisdiction

Parking Garage Law?

Link to Ordinance

Age Requirement

Height Requirement

Inspection Frequency

Year Effective

New York, NY

No

Any

> 6 stories

5 years

1980

Columbus, OH

No

≥ 20 years

N/A1

5 years

1985

Detroit, MI

No

Any

≥ 5 stories

5 years

1988

Boston, MA

No

Any

> 70 ft

5 years2

1995

Chicago, IL

No

Any

> 80 ft

Ongoing (2 years); Additional (for critical conditions at 4, 8, or 12 years)

1996

Milwaukee, WI

No

≥ 15 years

5 stories

5, 8, or 12 years, depending on Category

2001

Pittsburgh, PA

No

Any

Any

5 years

2004

Philadelphia, PA

No

Any

≥ 6 stories or
> 60 ft

5 years

2010

Cincinnati, OH

No

≥ 15 years

> 5 stories or
> 60 ft

5, 8, or 12 years

2016

Cleveland, OH

≥ 30 years

≥ 5 stories or
≥ 75 f

5 years

2016

San Francisco, CA

No

Any

≥ 5 stories

10 years

2016

St. Louis, MO

No

Any

> 5 stories or
> 60 ft

3 years

2018

Jersey City, NJ

No

Any

≥ 4 stories
(Masonry)
> 6 stories  (All Others)

5 years

2021

1Columbus, OH: In lieu of a height requirement, the ordinance states: “…requirements shall apply to each building that is (1) 20 years old or older; and (2) Located within ten feet of a public right-of-way…”
2Boston, MA
: 5 years for occupied structures, annually for unoccupied structures (Sec 9-9.12.b)

Who Is Affected?

These ordinances typically target mid-to-high-rise buildings, generally defined as those exceeding five or six stories. Many cities also include an age threshold; for instance, Cleveland’s ordinance applies to buildings that are at least 30 years old. Additionally, some jurisdictions (such as Pittsburgh) exempt specific building types, including certain residential uses. Building owners should verify whether their structure meets the specific criteria of their local ordinance.

Inspection Requirements

Frequency & Scheduling:
While a 5-year cycle is common, some cities adopt risk-based schedules. For example, Chicago requires ongoing inspections for certain buildings every 2 years, with additional critical examinations at 4, 8, or 12-year intervals depending on facade classification. Milwaukee also employs a variable inspection schedule based on facade category, requiring inspections every 5, 8, or 12 years.

Methodology:
Inspections generally involve both visual assessments and more detailed evaluations, following standards such as ASTM E2270. This standard outlines procedures for identifying unsafe conditions in building facades.

Qualified Inspectors:
Inspections must be performed and/or supervised by licensed professionals, typically a Professional Engineer (PE) or Registered Architect (RA), to ensure compliance with local codes and safety standards. Some jurisdictions may require specific qualifications beyond state licensing.

Enforcement and Penalties

Enforcement and penalties vary widely by jurisdiction. For example, New York City imposes strict fines for noncompliance—up to $1,000 per month and $5,000 per year until remedial work is completed. In contrast, other cities have less clearly defined penalties or different enforcement mechanisms. Building owners should carefully review their local ordinances to ensure compliance and avoid costly fines.

The Importance of Proactive Maintenance

Public Safety:
A single loose piece of masonry can pose a severe hazard to pedestrians and property. Regular inspections allow early detection and repair of deterioration, reducing the risk of accidents and costly damage.

Financial Implications:
Non-compliance can result in steep fines and, over time, higher repair costs. Staying current with inspections and maintenance can save money and reduce liability.

Preservation of Property Value:
A well-maintained facade enhances curb appeal and market value while reducing overall liability risks.

Visual Example: Deferred Maintenance

Left: Cracked concrete at a slab edge. Right: The same area three years later, showing advanced deterioration due to deferred maintenance. Inaction allows deterioration mechanisms to continue and ultimately increases repair costs.

Understanding and complying with facade inspection laws is essential for building and parking garage owners who want to maintain safety, prevent costly fines, and preserve property value. Staying informed about local facade inspection laws ensures your structure remains compliant, and your occupants stay protected.

About the Author: Nick Heim, P.E.

Nick Heim, P.E., is a civil engineer with seven years of experience in the repair and restoration of existing structures and host of the AEC Engineering and Technology Podcast (AECTECH), where he brings valuable insights and expertise to listeners worldwide.

Nick’s interests lie at the intersection between the built world and technology, and he can be found looking for the ever-changing answer to the question, “How can we do this better?” Nick can be found on LinkedIn, producing content about the use of technologies in his civil engineering career and small business.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider downloading our free list of 33 Productivity Routines of Top Engineering Executives. Click the button below to download.

[thrive_2step id='14644'][su_button background="#e67e22" size="14" radius="10" style="flat"]Download the Productivity Routines[/su_button][/thrive_2step]

To your success,

Anthony Fasano, PE, LEED AP
Engineering Management Institute
Author of Engineer Your Own Success

Leave a Reply

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

And Get Custom Content Delivered To You Weekly

Categories
TECC Sidebar Featured Final